​With Lent on the horizon, it's time to reflect, renew, and make positive changes. I'm saddened by the Orthodox Church's current state. Some leaders speak out against the Muscovite church’s abuses, while others remain silent or even perpetuate Cyril’s malevolent phronema. 

Patriarch Bartholomew, Archbishop of Constantinople and Ecumenical Patriarch, has denounced the Patriarchate of Moscow for its attempts to “justify an unjustifiable, unholy, unprovoked, diabolical war against an independent country.” He has reminded us that “the Russian Church must share the blame for the crimes committed in Ukraine.” Despite the few rational voices within my church, silence implies approval, and I do not endorse it.

​The Orthodox Deplorables, Instigators of Schism

Throughout the annals of Church history, ecclesiastic unity persisted even in the face of acknowledged errors, ecclesiological disparities, and doctrinal heresy. Unity is a paramount virtue of Orthodoxy, a straightforward concept that Moscow appears to struggle with.

Orthodoxy, the timeless beacon of wisdom, in Russian hands will be reduced to a flickering candle in the hands of those who seem to mistake obscurity for enlightenment.

The Kariye Djami -From Byzantine Sanctuary to Controversial Mosque
​
The Kariye Djami, originally known as the Chora Monastery or the Monastery of Christ (Μονή του Χριστού της Χώρα), stands as a captivating symbol of Istanbul's rich history. Nestled in the Roman Capital, Constantinople, present-day Istanbul, Türkiye, this ancient structure resides near the Charisios Gate (Edirnekapı) and south of the Palace of the Porphyrogenitus (Tekfur Sarayı). The term "chora" (χώρα), suggesting "land" or "in the country," resonates with the rural nature of its location, originally beyond the city walls constructed by Constantine. The site likely remained sparsely populated even during the Ottoman era, contributing to the mystery surrounding Chora's early history.

​In the grand tapestry of Orthodox Christianity, the Muscovite church's insatiable expansionism strives to assert authority over the entire ecclesiastical and political realm. Since the 15th century, this far-fetched narrative has utilized deceit to undermine canonical ecclesiology. As in modern Ukraine, the Moscow Patriarch seeks to delegitimize the local Church, thereby making their desired territory available for ecclesiastic invasion. The Moscow Patriarchate's trajectory toward apostasy has reached its culmination, prompting Orthodox observers, theologians, and historians to grapple with deciphering and clarifying for the layman an understanding of the Moscow Patriarchate’s problematic evil conduct.
​

​The connection is profound, marked by a symbiotic relationship that some perceive as parasitic while others consider commensalism. Regardless of the viewpoint, it is evident that the Russian people are firmly entwined in this intricate and incestuous Church-State relationship, with no discernible alternative reality, since the inception of the Muscovite church, which customarily pursues its desires without concern for consequences.

 
Within Orthodoxy, a narrative - voiced solely by Russian hierarchical circles - persists that seeks to equate the Ecumenical Patriarchate's privileges, those endowed by the ecumenical councils, with actions similar in intent to Roman Catholicism's Papal throne (infallibility) as many Russkiy mir bishops retorted a few years back: “If we wanted a pope, we'd go to the real one.” Nevertheless, in this narrative lies a profound truth that transcends theological discourse: the recognition that no institution, no matter how revered or esteemed, is immune to the human frailty of fallibility. Recognizing these imperfections, we embark on a journey to explore the seldom-discussed moments when the venerable Ecumenical Patriarchate, a paragon of wisdom and righteousness, succumbed to worldly fallible judgment. Through the annals of history, we unveil these compelling episodes with a measured dose of introspection, discernment, and a commitment to the pursuit of truth.
​

"We must not mind insulting men if by respecting them we offend God."
​~ Saint John Chrysostom

​Our beloved All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew says, “We call once again for an immediate end to the fratricidal war, which, like any war, undermines human dignity." And Patriarch Cyril says, dying in the fratricidal war against Ukraine "cleanses away all sins."

Archbishop Anastasios, you and those silent hierarchs are on the wrong side of history.

It's important to note that discussing religious or cultural matters can be sensitive, and different people may have varying opinions on what changes or actions the Church of Albania might need. "Catharsis" typically refers to a process of emotional release or purification. In the context of the Church of Albania, this could be interpreted in various ways:

• Historical Context: The Church of Albania has a complex history, which includes periods of suppression and restoration. The church needs to confront and heal from its historical traumas or conflicts.
• Internal Reforms: The Church of Albania needs internal reforms or a renewal of its spiritual and moral values to cleanse itself from perceived impurities or Soviet corruption.
• Reconciliation: A need for reconciliation within the church or various communities within Orthodoxy.

The specific nature of the catharsis and the reasons behind this statement depend on the context and perspective from which it is made and how it is received. 

Archbishop Anastasios journeys along the trail, in pursuit of Patriarch Cyril, to the brink's edge they sail.
​
Since Pascha (Easter) 2023, every "Official Press Release of the Synod" attacks the Hierarchy, Clergy, and Archons of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. To the delight of the Russian propaganda machine...

Από το Πάσχα του 2023, κάθε «Επίσημο Δελτίο Τύπου της Συνόδου» αποτελεί επίθεση σχετικά με την Ιεραρχία, Κλήρου και Αρχόντων του Οικουμενικού Πατριαρχείου
​

What else can you say? Τι άλλο να πεις; Çfarë tjetër mund të thuash?
​

I am embarrassed by the public decline of the most eminent 20th-century missionary.